IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Campbell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-04-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Kalamazoo Jr. K-Wings NAHL 36 1 6 7 0.194 0.0691 0.0714 0.2041 0.2110
2012-13 — NAHL 54 2 5 7 0.130 0.0460 0.0453 0.1361 0.1339
2013-14 Michigan Warriors NAHL 58 4 13 17 0.293 0.1041 0.0972 0.3077 0.2873
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 32 2 15 17 0.531
2016-17 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 29 7 7 14 0.483
2015-16 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 28 4 5 9 0.321
2014-15 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 24 2 7 9 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2014-15 · St. Norbert
+419.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19186
Defenseman overall
#1859
Defenseman born in 1993
#5654
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyson Kirkby
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Inderieden
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2008-09
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Zalewski
Buffalo State · 2001-02
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.