← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caleb O'Brien Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-08-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Flint Jr. Generals NA3HL 41 4 19 23 0.561 0.0704 0.0761 0.1771 0.1913
2011-12 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 32 0 3 3 0.094 0.0345 0.0362 0.0990 0.1040
2012-13 NAHL 45 6 7 13 0.289 0.1061 0.1061 0.3049 0.3050
2013-14 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 51 0 9 9 0.176 0.0648 0.0616 0.1863 0.1770
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast 24 1 6 7 0.292
2016-17 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast 18 1 3 4 0.222
2015-16 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast 15 3 7 10 0.667
2014-15 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen 16 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#20836
Defenseman overall
#1963
Defenseman born in 1993

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern Maine · 2024-25
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2018-19
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.