IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lucas Hendrickson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-08-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Chicago Hitmen NAHL 13 1 1 2 0.154 0.0546 0.0519 0.1615 0.1534
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 28 1 10 11 0.393
2014-15 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 26 4 7 11 0.423
2013-14 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 25 0 10 10 0.400
2012-13 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 25 2 5 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2012-13 · Augsburg
+471.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23876
Defenseman overall
#2010
Defenseman born in 1991
#6378
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Lennartson
Augsburg · 2007-08
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Flack
St. Michael's College · 2016-17
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Nyman
Hamline · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.