IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gordon Wells Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Fresno Monsters NAHL 49 8 10 18 0.367 0.1305 0.1285 0.3874 0.3816
2013-14 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 56 16 12 28 0.500 0.1777 0.1661 0.5274 0.4931
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 23 8 3 11 0.478
2016-17 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 23 1 4 5 0.217
2015-16 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 18 4 0 4 0.222
2014-15 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 13 2 2 4 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2014-15 · St. Olaf
+138.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32059
Forward overall
#1101
Forward born in 1993
#2959
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Doner
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendon Gysbers
St. Norbert · 2017-18
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Michelcavage
Concordia (WI) · 2011-12
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.