IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Michelcavage Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-04-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Soo Eagles NOJHL 46 24 23 47 1.022 0.1706 0.1754 0.4253 0.4373
2010-11 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 45 23 27 50 1.111 0.1856 0.1810 0.4626 0.4512
2011-12 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 41 19 23 42 1.024 0.1711 0.1578 0.4265 0.3933
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Concordia D3 MIAC — 21 1 3 4 0.191
2013-14 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SO 21 1 3 4 0.191
2012-13 Concordia D3 MIAC — 25 5 7 12 0.480
2012-13 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA FR 25 5 7 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2012-13 · Concordia
+235.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21470
Forward overall
#781
Forward born in 1991
#127
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Danny O'Donnell
Aurora · 2016-17
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Quigley
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Miller
Fitchburg State · 2018-19
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.