IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitch Hall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-01-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 — NAHL 46 5 11 16 0.348 0.1378 0.1341 0.3652 0.3555
2013-14 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 59 6 37 43 0.729 0.2888 0.2666 0.7652 0.7064
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Hamline D1 — SR 25 5 5 10 0.400
2018-19 Hamline D3 MIAC GR 25 5 5 10 0.400
2017-18 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 2 0 2 2 1.000
2016-17 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 26 6 22 28 1.077
2015-16 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 27 8 17 25 0.926
2014-15 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 29 2 10 12 0.414
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2014-15 · Hamline
+105.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5271
Defenseman overall
#827
Defenseman born in 1993
#1885
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Schlifke
Fredonia · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Glenn Wiswell
Castleton · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Sleep
St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.516 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.