IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-07-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 — NAHL 7 1 0 1 0.143 0.0525 0.0523 0.1508 0.1503
2013-14 Mason City Toros NA3HL 40 27 20 47 1.175 0.1475 0.1379 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen JR 25 1 0 1 0.040
2015-16 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 12 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 25 3 1 4 0.160
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2014-15 · Wisconsin-Superior
+80.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19089
Forward overall
#655
Forward born in 1993
#1193
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitchell Snider
Manhattanville · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Zachary Cormier
Anna Maria · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Etter
Gustavus Adolphus · 2015-16
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.