← New Search ↗ Social Card

Reid Pabich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Madison Capitols USHL 40 1 1 2 0.050 0.0307 0.0346 0.1473 0.1658
2018-19 Madison Capitols USHL 55 1 5 6 0.109 0.0671 0.0721 0.3214 0.3452
2019-20 Madison Capitols USHL 50 13 17 30 0.600 0.3688 0.3688 1.7677 1.7677
2020-21 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 53 10 12 22 0.415 0.2552 0.2552 1.2230 1.2230
2021-22 Madison Capitols USHL 61 18 26 44 0.721 0.4434 0.4095 2.1251 1.9627
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 40 15 18 33 0.825
2024-25 Sacred Heart D1 AHA 39 13 15 28 0.718
2023-24 Maine D1 HockeyEast 21 1 4 5 0.238
2022-23 Maine D1 HockeyEast 31 2 5 7 0.226
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2022-23 · Maine
-3.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10622
Forward overall
#463
Forward born in 2001
#1000
in USHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2021-22
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.