IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Nugent Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-05-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Soo Eagles NAHL 17 0 1 1 0.059 0.0216 0.0225 0.0621 0.0645
2013-14 — NAHL 26 3 3 6 0.231 0.0848 0.0839 0.2436 0.2410
2014-15 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 44 12 42 54 1.227 0.2835 0.2686 0.6005 0.5688
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Lake Forest D1 NCHA SR 26 1 5 6 0.231
2018-19 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 26 1 5 6 0.231
2017-18 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 7 2 2 4 0.571
2016-17 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 11 0 1 1 0.091
2015-16 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 17 2 2 4 0.235
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2015-16 · Lake Forest
+41.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24064
Forward overall
#936
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kevin Van Dyk
Castleton · 2010-11
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sebastian Panetta
SUNY Geneseo · 2005-06
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor McKinney
Buffalo State · 2008-09
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.