IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Brodersen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-05-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Soo Eagles NAHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 North Bay Trappers NOJHL 32 6 9 15 0.469 0.0798 0.0782 0.1987 0.1948
2014-15 Mattawa Blackhawks NOJHL 51 21 26 47 0.922 0.1569 0.1447 0.3906 0.3602
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 St. Olaf D1 MIAC SR 14 1 0 1 0.071
2018-19 St. Olaf D3 MIAC — 14 1 0 1 0.071
2017-18 St. Olaf D3 MIAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 St. Olaf D3 MIAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#32565
Forward overall
#1246
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cayden Sweitzer
Post · 2024-25
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Felix Lamoureux
Hobart · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Soucy
King's · 2023-24
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.