← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Sundgren Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-02-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 7 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Mason City Toros NA3HL 8 2 4 6 0.750 0.0904 0.0826 0.2369 0.2165
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 22 0 2 2 0.091
2016-17 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 20 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern Maine · 2023-24
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.679 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2024-25
0.524 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.