IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Pappalardo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Elite 42 36 52 88 2.095 0.1934 0.1889 0.4798 0.4686
2022-23 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 46 14 14 28 0.609 0.1406 0.1407 0.2978 0.2980
2023-24 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 40 10 16 26 0.650 0.1502 0.1427 0.3180 0.3022
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Southern Maine D3 NEHC SO 5 0 1 1 0.200
2024-25 Southern Maine D3 NEHC FR 15 0 5 5 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2024-25 · Southern Maine
+174.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20929
Forward overall
#1087
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Daniel Urban
Skidmore · 2024-25
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Carlos Ross
Western New England · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey Sundgren
St. Olaf · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.