IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Stark Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-04-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Madison Capitols USHL 33 0 2 2 0.061 0.0357 0.0357 0.1820 0.1822
2018-19 Madison Capitols USHL 56 6 5 11 0.196 0.1159 0.1101 0.5899 0.5602
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Augustana D1 CCHA — 30 2 3 5 0.167
2022-23 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 30 1 0 1 0.033
2021-22 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 29 0 2 2 0.069
2020-21 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 22 0 1 1 0.045
2019-20 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 34 0 4 4 0.118
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2019-20 · Colgate
+55.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19593
Defenseman overall
#2989
Defenseman born in 1999
#3949
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Stroud
Western New England · 2009-10
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Quinn Waller
Adrian · 2005-06
1.586 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Luschinski
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.