IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Andrews Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-09-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 51 6 10 16 0.314 0.1153 0.1157 0.3311 0.3323
2014-15 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 49 5 24 29 0.592 0.2174 0.2068 0.6246 0.5940
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 St. Norbert D1 NCHA SR 31 2 5 7 0.226
2018-19 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 31 2 5 7 0.226
2017-18 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 27 2 8 10 0.370
2016-17 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 22 2 7 9 0.409
2015-16 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 27 1 9 10 0.370
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2015-16 · St. Norbert
+130.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7326
Defenseman overall
#1143
Defenseman born in 1994
#2650
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trevor Bayda
St. Norbert · 2002-03
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Samodral
Chatham · 2023-24
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Emil Elias
New England College · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.