IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Andrews Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-09-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 51 6 10 16 0.314 0.1165 0.1169 0.3321 0.3333
2014-15 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 49 5 24 29 0.592 0.2197 0.2089 0.6266 0.5959
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 31 2 5 7 0.226
2017-18 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 27 2 8 10 0.370
2016-17 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 22 2 7 9 0.409
2015-16 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 27 1 9 10 0.370
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2015-16 · St. Norbert
+127.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5283
Defenseman overall
#939
Defenseman born in 1994
#2436
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trevor Bayda
St. Norbert · 2002-03
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Payton Baldillez
Norwich · 2013-14
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Santiago
Utica · 2009-10
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.