IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner Okeson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-02-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 55 4 12 16 0.291 0.1153 0.1181 0.3054 0.3128
2014-15 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 60 7 18 25 0.417 0.1651 0.1605 0.4375 0.4252
2015-16 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 58 3 18 21 0.362 0.1435 0.1331 0.3802 0.3527
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 27 1 9 10 0.370
2019-20 Concordia (MN) D1 — SR 27 1 9 10 0.370
2018-19 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 26 3 12 15 0.577
2018-19 Concordia (MN) D1 — JR 26 3 12 15 0.577
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 26 6 9 15 0.577
2016-17 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 27 1 6 7 0.259
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2016-17 · Concordia
+90.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11255
Defenseman overall
#1561
Defenseman born in 1995
#3973
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lane Boswell
Marian · 2007-08
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Derlago
Utica · 2014-15
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
TJ Christensen
Bethel · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.