← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Capone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-12-17 Country: USA
2020 NHL Draft Round 5, Pick #157  ·  Tampa Bay Lightning Tampa Bay Lightning
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1475 0.1675 0.7366 0.8366
2018-19 Tri-City Storm USHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.1180 0.1279 0.5892 0.6388
2019-20 Tri-City Storm USHL 34 7 12 19 0.559 0.3296 0.3296 1.6463 1.6463
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 UConn D1 HockeyEast SR 32 4 4 8 0.250
2022-23 UConn D1 HockeyEast JR 35 9 9 18 0.514
2021-22 UConn D1 HockeyEast SO 31 4 7 11 0.355
2020-21 UConn D1 HockeyEast FR 20 1 4 5 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2020-21 · UConn
+103.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10131
Forward overall
#431
Forward born in 2001
#929
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Penn State (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Cornell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Yale (0.88 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan State
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2017-18
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2006-07
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.