IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Jancze Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-02-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 24 6 2 8 0.333 0.1184 0.1155 0.3516 0.3430
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SR 26 8 4 12 0.462
2016-17 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC JR 21 2 5 7 0.333
2015-16 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SO 23 4 7 11 0.478
2014-15 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC FR 24 4 6 10 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2014-15 · Wesleyan
+321.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#40196
Forward overall
#1608
Forward born in 1994
#4208
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devlin O'Kane
SUNY Cortland · 2021-22
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Board
Neumann · 2012-13
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Sabitsky
Trinity · 2013-14
0.724 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.