IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Sabitsky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-02-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 53 14 11 25 0.472 0.1817 0.1755 0.6873 0.6640
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 27 10 13 23 0.852
2016-17 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 31 18 16 34 1.097
2015-16 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 28 12 17 29 1.036
2014-15 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 29 10 11 21 0.724
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.72
2014-15 · Trinity
+382.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32052
Forward overall
#1224
Forward born in 1994
#1808
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shawn Kennedy
Elmira · 2018-19
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Lynden
Manhattanville · 2004-05
0.529 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Frankie DeAugustine
UMass Boston · 2010-11
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.