IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew McLean Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-01-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 54 2 5 7 0.130 0.0481 0.0491 0.1372 0.1401
2014-15 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 58 6 15 21 0.362 0.1344 0.1302 0.3834 0.3713
2015-16 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 57 5 22 27 0.474 0.1759 0.1626 0.5016 0.4636
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 28 3 18 21 0.750
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 31 5 17 22 0.710
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SO 30 5 6 11 0.367
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen FR 19 0 7 7 0.368
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2016-17 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+160.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8480
Defenseman overall
#1283
Defenseman born in 1995
#3707
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gabriel Laflamme
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Schindel
Manhattanville · 2007-08
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rob Turville
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.