IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Wolfe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-11-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Michigan Warriors NAHL 7 1 1 2 0.286 0.1061 0.1128 0.3025 0.3217
2014-15 Michigan Warriors NAHL 34 0 4 4 0.118 0.0437 0.0442 0.1245 0.1259
2015-16 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 54 16 28 44 0.815 0.1374 0.1304 0.3385 0.3212
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 26 0 4 4 0.154
2018-19 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 28 2 3 5 0.179
2017-18 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 27 3 2 5 0.185
2016-17 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 28 4 4 8 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2016-17 · Salem State
+248.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#38459
Forward overall
#1637
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Micky Knox
Wisconsin-Stout · 2010-11
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Jewett
Stonehill · 2015-16
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Manoukian
Endicott · 2018-19
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.