IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Wickline Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 10 0 2 2 0.200 0.0735 0.0753 0.2111 0.2163
2014-15 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 56 7 23 30 0.536 0.1968 0.1913 0.5654 0.5496
2015-16 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 59 6 29 35 0.593 0.2179 0.2022 0.6261 0.5809
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SO 27 7 12 19 0.704
2016-17 UMass Boston D3 MASCAC FR 26 3 4 7 0.269
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2016-17 · UMass Boston
+58.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29103
Forward overall
#1139
Forward born in 1995
#2578
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryden McGhee
Williams · 2009-10
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
John Doyle
SUNY Morrisville · 2012-13
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Franco Loparco
Concordia · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.