IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Owings Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-06-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 25 0 2 2 0.080 0.0284 0.0310 0.0840 0.0918
2015-16 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 57 1 15 16 0.281 0.1082 0.1062 0.4090 0.4014
2016-17 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 57 3 26 29 0.509 0.1960 0.1824 0.7414 0.6898
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 23 0 5 5 0.217
2019-20 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 25 1 9 10 0.400
2018-19 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 10 0 1 1 0.100
2017-18 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 13 1 2 3 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2017-18 · Adrian
+60.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13237
Defenseman overall
#1817
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Porrier
Johnson & Wales · 2010-11
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Rob Sgarbossa
SUNY Morrisville · 2006-07
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Zdanowicz
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.