← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Zdanowicz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 New Jersey 87's EHL 13 5 4 9 0.692 0.1486 0.1486 0.3390 0.3390
2021-22 New Jersey 87's EHL 39 18 23 41 1.051 0.2256 0.2184 0.5148 0.4983
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western New England D3 CNE 15 5 4 9 0.600
2024-25 Western New England D3 CNE 21 6 6 12 0.571
2023-24 Western New England D3 CNE 24 1 15 16 0.667
2022-23 UMass Dartmouth D3 FR 23 7 8 15 0.652
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2022-23 · UMass Dartmouth
+248.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20981
Forward overall
#749
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2012-13
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.