← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Zdanowicz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 New Jersey 87's EHL 13 5 4 9 0.692 0.1599 0.1599 0.3387 0.3387
2021-22 New Jersey 87's EHL 39 18 23 41 1.051 0.2429 0.2351 0.5144 0.4979
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western New England D3 CNE SR 15 5 4 9 0.600
2024-25 Western New England D3 CNE 21 6 6 12 0.571
2023-24 Western New England D3 CNE 24 1 15 16 0.667
2022-23 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 23 7 8 15 0.652
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2022-23 · UMass Dartmouth
+224.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14747
Forward overall
#691
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2023-24
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2012-13
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.