← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ayrton Valente Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-07-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Vaughan Vipers OJHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Vaughan Vipers OJHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 49 8 9 17 0.347 0.0969 0.0992 0.2394 0.2450
2012-13 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 47 7 16 23 0.489 0.1367 0.1331 0.3377 0.3287
2013-14 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 25 5 12 17 0.680 0.1900 0.1752 0.4693 0.4328
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SR 26 3 15 18 0.692
2016-17 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 JR 26 6 15 21 0.808
2015-16 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SO 25 3 8 11 0.440
2014-15 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 FR 24 3 10 13 0.542
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2014-15 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+262.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6988
Defenseman overall
#1064
Defenseman born in 1993

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2003-04
1.235 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2012-13
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2017-18
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.