← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Solat Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-02-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Bay State Breakers USPHL-Premier-Classic 47 9 10 19 0.404 0.1135 0.1185 0.3325 0.3471
2015-16 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 33 6 10 16 0.485 0.1361 0.1354 0.3987 0.3966
2016-17 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier-Classic 40 19 21 40 1.000 0.2807 0.2656 0.8224 0.7780
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Brockport D1 JR 25 7 8 15 0.600
2019-20 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC JR 25 7 8 15 0.600
2018-19 Brockport D1 SO 26 7 9 16 0.615
2018-19 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SO 26 7 9 16 0.615
2017-18 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 25 3 2 5 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2017-18 · SUNY Brockport
+9.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28781
Forward overall
#1195
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2018-19
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.