IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Bittner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-09-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 33 2 9 11 0.333 0.0943 0.0945 0.2100 0.2104
2014-15 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 57 7 35 42 0.737 0.2084 0.1980 0.4643 0.4410
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 31 3 13 16 0.516
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 23 0 6 6 0.261
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SO 27 4 11 15 0.556
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#6296
Defenseman overall
#1042
Defenseman born in 1994
#816
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gabriel Filion
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2024-25
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Cecka
Wisconsin-Stout · 2009-10
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyllian Kirkwood
Westfield State · 2011-12
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.