IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Oskar Andrén Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-29 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Djurgårdens IF U20 SHL-J20 22 5 4 9 0.409 0.2274 0.2377 0.5451 0.5699
2013-14 Djurgårdens IF U20 SuperElit 42 7 22 29 0.691 0.2725 0.2754 0.9378 0.9477
2014-15 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 51 18 29 47 0.922 0.3386 0.3314 0.9727 0.9521
2015-16 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 28 8 14 22 0.786 0.2887 0.2698 0.8293 0.7751
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Ferris State D1 WCHA SR 16 1 2 3 0.188
2018-19 Ferris State D1 WCHA SR 24 2 8 10 0.417
2016-17 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 16 0 4 4 0.250
2015-16 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 21 2 3 5 0.238
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2015-16 · Boston University
-10.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12177
Forward overall
#495
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robert Clerc
SUNY Potsdam · 2017-18
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Johnson
Saint John's · 2018-19
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Pickup
Concordia · 2016-17
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.