IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Soucier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Caledon Admirals OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 Wellington Dukes OJHL 46 7 15 22 0.478 0.1172 0.1233 0.3292 0.3464
2013-14 Wellington Dukes OJHL 44 13 24 37 0.841 0.2061 0.2063 0.5788 0.5795
2014-15 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 54 17 18 35 0.648 0.2381 0.2316 0.6850 0.6662
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SR 29 1 2 3 0.103
2017-18 Bemidji State D1 WCHA JR 17 1 5 6 0.353
2016-17 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SO 31 3 0 3 0.097
2015-16 Bemidji State D1 WCHA FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#24193
Forward overall
#916
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shawn Kennedy
Elmira · 2018-19
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gage Christianson
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2011-12
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Allan Bamberg
Manhattanville · 2009-10
0.812 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.