IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hampus Sjödahl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-09-27 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Djurgårdens IF U20 SHL-J20 43 6 7 13 0.302 0.1680 0.1717 0.4028 0.4116
2014-15 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 55 19 15 34 0.618 0.2271 0.2280 0.6525 0.6549
2015-16 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 60 35 34 69 1.150 0.4225 0.4054 1.2138 1.1646
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SR 34 3 9 12 0.353
2018-19 Bemidji State D1 WCHA JR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SO 33 3 2 5 0.151
2016-17 Bemidji State D1 WCHA FR 24 0 1 1 0.042
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.04
2016-17 · Bemidji State
-85.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13740
Forward overall
#546
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Herdt
Concordia · 2015-16
1.273 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Imala
Fitchburg State · 2022-23
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Daxton St. Hilaire
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.