IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Springman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-02-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Minot Minotauros NAHL 59 13 18 31 0.525 0.2082 0.2127 0.5516 0.5635
2015-16 Minot Minotauros NAHL 56 14 21 35 0.625 0.2476 0.2420 0.6562 0.6413
2016-17 Minot Minotauros NAHL 57 10 19 29 0.509 0.2016 0.1861 0.5342 0.4930
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Scholastica D1 — JR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 St. Scholastica D3 — JR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 St. Scholastica D1 — SO 8 0 1 1 0.125
2018-19 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 8 0 1 1 0.125
2017-18 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 11 1 1 2 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2017-18 · St. Scholastica
1.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25538
Forward overall
#1037
Forward born in 1996
#2077
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Grealish
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vinny Post
Adrian · 2015-16
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Bobrow
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.