← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nils Rygaard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-11 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Linköping HC U20 SHL-J20 1 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Linköping HC U20 SHL-J20 15 3 2 5 0.333 0.1859 0.1947 0.4803 0.5030
2013-14 Linköping HC U20 SuperElit 39 7 17 24 0.615 0.2369 0.2398 0.8000 0.8099
2014-15 Janesville Jets NAHL 58 15 12 27 0.466 0.1728 0.1695 0.4929 0.4834
2015-16 Janesville Jets NAHL 22 4 12 16 0.727 0.2700 0.2528 0.7701 0.7211
2019-20 Södertälje SK U20 SuperElit 1 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SR 33 3 6 9 0.273
2017-18 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA JR 24 1 2 3 0.125
2016-17 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SO 28 2 4 6 0.214
2015-16 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA FR 14 1 4 5 0.357
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2015-16 · Alaska Anchorage
+111.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14027
Forward overall
#496
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2010-11
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2011-12
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.