IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Lynch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 56 15 7 22 0.393 0.1444 0.1502 0.4153 0.4320
2015-16 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 57 29 27 56 0.983 0.3610 0.3596 1.0384 1.0343
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Robert Morris D1 AHA SR 37 5 12 17 0.460
2018-19 Robert Morris D1 AHA JR 40 10 21 31 0.775
2017-18 Robert Morris D1 AHA SO 41 17 20 37 0.902
2016-17 Robert Morris D1 AHA FR 37 9 11 20 0.540
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2016-17 · Robert Morris
+128.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16623
Forward overall
#646
Forward born in 1996
#873
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Brett Skibba
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
John Simonson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Garret Clemment
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jay Dickman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andy Willock
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2004-05
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Master
Stevenson · 2017-18
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Saini
Adrian · 2022-23
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.