IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tucker DeYoung Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-03-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 58 10 10 20 0.345 0.1267 0.1303 0.3639 0.3741
2015-16 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 60 13 25 38 0.633 0.2327 0.2289 0.6684 0.6576
2016-17 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 45 27 33 60 1.333 0.3743 0.3557 1.0962 1.0417
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Army D1 AHA SR 21 5 5 10 0.476
2019-20 Army D1 AHA JR 16 1 1 2 0.125
2018-19 Army D1 AHA SO 25 2 0 2 0.080
2017-18 Army D1 AHA FR 24 2 7 9 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2017-18 · Army
+43.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17733
Forward overall
#687
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Kulas
Utica · 2006-07
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Zack Bross
UMass Boston · 2016-17
1.518 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Keenan Hodgson
Amherst · 2013-14
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.