IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Mettler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-07-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Minot Minotauros NAHL 46 3 9 12 0.261 0.0927 0.0921 0.2739 0.2722
2015-16 Minot Minotauros NAHL 53 0 15 15 0.283 0.1005 0.0954 0.2971 0.2820
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Scholastica D1 — SR 27 1 5 6 0.222
2019-20 St. Scholastica D3 — SR 27 1 5 6 0.222
2018-19 St. Scholastica D1 — JR 22 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 St. Scholastica D3 — JR 22 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 26 1 1 2 0.077
2016-17 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 23 1 4 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2016-17 · St. Scholastica
+144.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15669
Defenseman overall
#1918
Defenseman born in 1995
#4977
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Will Blake
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eli Kim-Swallow
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Ishmael
Wisconsin-Superior · 2021-22
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.