← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Ondris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-07-07 Country: Slovakia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 KooKoo U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 17 1 3 4 0.235 0.1275 0.1384 0.3495 0.3795
2022-23 KooKoo U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 43 11 13 24 0.558 0.3025 0.3154 0.8289 0.8642
2023-24 KooKoo U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 47 5 9 14 0.298 0.1615 0.1597 0.4424 0.4376
2024-25 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 57 24 19 43 0.754 0.2680 0.2553 0.7920 0.7545
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hobart D3 SUNYAC 24 5 4 9 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2025-26 · Hobart
+101.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20408
Forward overall
#1102
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2009-10
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2024-25
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.781 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.