IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Hartman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-07-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 52 1 9 10 0.192 0.0683 0.0714 0.2019 0.2110
2015-16 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 43 3 6 9 0.209 0.0588 0.0597 0.1724 0.1751
2016-17 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 38 4 12 16 0.421 0.1182 0.1143 0.3468 0.3354
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Geneseo D1 — JR 18 2 4 6 0.333
2019-20 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 18 2 4 6 0.333
2018-19 Geneseo D1 — SO 24 3 3 6 0.250
2018-19 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 24 3 3 6 0.250
2017-18 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 24 0 9 9 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2017-18 · SUNY Geneseo
+329.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18704
Defenseman overall
#2279
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mark Williams
Marian · 2007-08
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alan Boozer
Johnson & Wales · 2013-14
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Munroe
SUNY Geneseo · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.