IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Braxton Collins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-03-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 52 1 6 7 0.135 0.0500 0.0513 0.1425 0.1463
2015-16 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 50 7 6 13 0.260 0.0965 0.0948 0.2753 0.2704
2016-17 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 36 4 4 8 0.222 0.0825 0.0765 0.2353 0.2183
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SR 5 0 2 2 0.400
2019-20 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen JR 14 0 2 2 0.143
2018-19 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SO 14 1 0 1 0.071
2017-18 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen FR 6 1 1 2 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2017-18 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+364.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#40156
Forward overall
#1848
Forward born in 1996
#5208
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Zakrzewski
SUNY Cortland · 2024-25
0.524 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Cavanagh
Babson · 2021-22
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Davison
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.679 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.