IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caleb Schroer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 22 2 4 6 0.273 0.1002 0.1036 0.2878 0.2977
2015-16 — NAHL 55 12 12 24 0.436 0.1603 0.1587 0.4606 0.4560
2016-17 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 59 26 41 67 1.136 0.4172 0.3904 1.1986 1.1215
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA JR 25 3 5 8 0.320
2018-19 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SO 27 0 7 7 0.259
2017-18 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA FR 16 1 0 1 0.062
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2017-18 · Northern Michigan
-75.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17168
Forward overall
#662
Forward born in 1996
#947
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Scorcia
Salve Regina · 2010-11
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
John Moncovich
Utica · 2018-19
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Depp
Elmira · 2011-12
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.