← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tristan Amonte Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-02-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 39 2 2 4 0.103 0.0605 0.0599 0.3079 0.3049
2019-20 Penticton Vees BCHL 56 15 19 34 0.607 0.2339 0.2339 0.8830 0.8830
2020-21 Penticton Vees BCHL 18 6 8 14 0.778 0.2997 0.2997 1.1312 1.1312
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 38 4 2 6 0.158
2023-24 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 8 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 16 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 17 1 2 3 0.176
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2021-22 · Boston University
+244.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26093
Forward overall
#1263
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2006-07
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2003-04
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.