← New Search ↗ Social Card

Keaton Leininger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-03-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 9 1 1 2 0.222 0.0880 0.0906 0.2333 0.2401
2015-16 MJHL 60 15 5 20 0.333 0.0906 0.0881 0.2100 0.2043
2016-17 Dauphin Kings MJHL 59 24 23 47 0.797 0.2166 0.2001 0.5020 0.4639
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 25 2 8 10 0.400
2020-21 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 2 0 2 2 1.000
2020-21 Concordia (MN) D1 SR 2 0 2 2 1.000
2019-20 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 14 1 3 4 0.286
2019-20 Concordia (MN) D1 JR 14 1 3 4 0.286
2018-19 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 19 1 0 1 0.053
2018-19 Concordia (MN) D1 SO 19 1 0 1 0.053
2017-18 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 FR 7 1 1 2 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2017-18 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+115.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34155
Forward overall
#1457
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2021-22
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2021-22
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.