← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grant Baetsen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-06-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 51 7 11 18 0.353 0.1075 0.1117 0.2615 0.2717
2016-17 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 58 16 26 42 0.724 0.2206 0.2182 0.5366 0.5308
2017-18 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 47 14 25 39 0.830 0.2528 0.2384 0.6150 0.5800
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 9 2 0 2 0.222
2020-21 Adrian D1 JR 21 3 6 9 0.429
2020-21 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 21 3 6 9 0.429
2019-20 Adrian D1 SO 24 2 8 10 0.417
2019-20 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 24 2 8 10 0.417
2018-19 Adrian D1 FR 13 0 1 1 0.077
2018-19 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 13 0 1 1 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2018-19 · Adrian
-61.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26719
Forward overall
#1207
Forward born in 1997
#2232
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Middlebury · 2018-19
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2003-04
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2007-08
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.