← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Makowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 30 2 9 11 0.367 0.1347 0.1343 0.3871 0.3859
2016-17 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 59 14 14 28 0.475 0.1744 0.1644 0.5009 0.4721
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Milwaukee School of Engineering D1 NCHA SR 17 9 5 14 0.824
2020-21 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SR 17 9 5 14 0.824
2019-20 Milwaukee School of Engineering D1 NCHA JR 25 9 7 16 0.640
2019-20 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 25 9 7 16 0.640
2018-19 Milwaukee School of Engineering D1 NCHA SO 26 7 11 18 0.692
2018-19 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 26 7 11 18 0.692
2017-18 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 13 1 2 3 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2017-18 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+77.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37202
Forward overall
#1611
Forward born in 1996
#3834
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2009-10
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.