IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aaron Murray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-04-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 46 2 9 11 0.239 0.0931 0.0904 0.3487 0.3387
2016-17 Merritt Centennials BCHL 34 0 9 9 0.265 0.1030 0.0948 0.3860 0.3552
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Stevenson D3 MAC SR 14 4 6 10 0.714
2019-20 Stevenson D3 MAC JR 28 2 18 20 0.714
2018-19 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 25 4 14 18 0.720
2017-18 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 26 1 11 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2017-18 · Stevenson
+425.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14481
Defenseman overall
#1935
Defenseman born in 1996
#5446
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Evan Pahos
St. Scholastica · 2023-24
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Novick
SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dominic Brenza
Stevenson · 2015-16
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.