IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Kenney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-05-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 17 15 5 20 1.177 0.1301 0.1270 0.3714 0.3626
2014-15 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 37 20 29 49 1.324 0.1465 0.1359 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 14 0 2 2 0.143
2015-16 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 22 1 2 3 0.136
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2015-16 · Wisconsin-Superior
+20.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16863
Forward overall
#679
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devon Becker
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Anderson
Augsburg · 2012-13
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor McKinney
Buffalo State · 2007-08
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.