← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Singerhouse Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New Jersey Jr. Titans EHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0244 0.0268 0.0816 0.0896
2014-15 New Jersey Jr. Titans EHL 6 1 2 3 0.500 0.0732 0.0769 0.2449 0.2573
2015-16 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 59 13 12 25 0.424 0.1505 0.1499 0.4469 0.4451
2016-17 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 60 13 21 34 0.567 0.2013 0.1896 0.5978 0.5630
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-River Falls D1 BigTen SR 9 6 1 7 0.778
2020-21 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 9 6 1 7 0.778
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D1 BigTen JR 26 5 6 11 0.423
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 26 5 6 11 0.423
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D1 BigTen SO 23 6 4 10 0.435
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 23 6 4 10 0.435
2017-18 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 24 3 4 7 0.292
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2017-18 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+96.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28098
Forward overall
#1161
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2001-02
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.