← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Hora Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-07-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0931 0.0993 0.2300 0.2454
2016-17 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 51 3 15 18 0.353 0.0986 0.1008 0.2435 0.2489
2017-18 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 9 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 48 7 18 25 0.521 0.1455 0.1346 0.3594 0.3325
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SR 4 3 0 3 0.750
2021-22 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC JR 22 5 13 18 0.818
2019-20 SUNY Brockport D3 FR 24 3 12 15 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2019-20 · SUNY Brockport
+420.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7446
Defenseman overall
#1202
Defenseman born in 1998
#2499
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Johnson & Wales · 2013-14
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.