← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jimmy Elser Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-09-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 40 2 8 10 0.250 0.0919 0.0973 0.2639 0.2793
2016-17 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 52 9 12 21 0.404 0.1484 0.1490 0.4262 0.4280
2017-18 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 53 13 12 25 0.472 0.1733 0.1654 0.4979 0.4753
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 University of New England D3 CNE 28 5 7 12 0.429
2020-21 University of New England D3 CNE JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 University of New England D3 CNE SO 22 7 3 10 0.455
2018-19 University of New England D3 CNE FR 17 3 4 7 0.412
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2018-19 · University of New England
+202.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34930
Forward overall
#1655
Forward born in 1997
#3476
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trinity · 2024-25
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2011-12
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
King's · 2023-24
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.