IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steven Mather Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-02-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Neepawa Titans MJHL 59 15 9 24 0.407 0.0783 0.0797 0.2563 0.2610
2015-16 Minot Minotauros NAHL 40 6 3 9 0.225 0.0799 0.0781 0.2373 0.2320
2016-17 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 58 17 11 28 0.483 0.1715 0.1584 0.5093 0.4703
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 St. Norbert D1 NCHA JR 24 1 4 5 0.208
2019-20 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 24 1 4 5 0.208
2018-19 St. Norbert D1 NCHA SO 28 2 5 7 0.250
2018-19 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 28 2 5 7 0.250
2017-18 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 12 4 0 4 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2017-18 · St. Norbert
+208.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#38550
Forward overall
#1690
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Noah Batis
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Rowbotham
Amherst · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Darcy
New England · 2017-18
0.724 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.