IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christian Canavati Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-08-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 16 2 1 3 0.188 0.0235 0.0256 0.0592 0.0646
2014-15 Alexandria Area High USHS-MN 25 5 16 21 0.840 0.1063 0.0982 0.2040 0.1884
2015-16 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 41 1 3 4 0.098 0.0359 0.0361 0.1030 0.1035
2016-17 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 48 1 8 9 0.188 0.0689 0.0655 0.1979 0.1882
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 6 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 5 0 1 1 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2017-18 · Saint John's
+294.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22690
Defenseman overall
#2577
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Vichorek
Hamline · 2008-09
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Cerda
Chatham · 2016-17
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Johannes Tammeorg
New England College · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.