IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Trapp Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-02-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Coulee Region Chill NA3HL 45 15 34 49 1.089 0.1312 0.1330 0.3440 0.3486
2015-16 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 8 1 0 1 0.125 0.0464 0.0453 0.1323 0.1292
2016-17 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 52 9 11 20 0.385 0.1428 0.1317 0.4072 0.3757
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Hamline D3 MIAC GR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 14 1 1 2 0.143
2018-19 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 22 3 8 11 0.500
2017-18 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 22 2 5 7 0.318
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2017-18 · Hamline
+282.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28114
Forward overall
#1201
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael McChesney
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex O'Dowd
Franklin Pierce · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincent Crivello
Nichols · 2015-16
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.